Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Crimes against Security Clearances - Obama, Clinton, DNC, and Life-long Govt. Lackeys

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Ivan le Fou View Post

    Pretty hard to prove something didn't happen, isn't it?
    I guess asking Julian would solve all of the worlds problems.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by J.Noah ה View Post
      If their is not enough "evidence" at this point, then their is also not enough evidence to conclude Uranium One... Hillary's Russian collusion...
      Intradasting. Do you see even conservative media channels talk about Uraniun One or Hillary’s Russia Collusion 24/7 like the media and Never Trumpers do about Trump?

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Jonathan View Post
        Intradasting. Do you see even conservative media channels talk about Uraniun One or Hillary’s Russia Collusion 24/7 like the media and Never Trumpers do about Trump?
        Besides Hannity, the liberal media is pretty bad about that.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Fargin View Post
          So of all of the things I listed, which can be dismissed or believed along partisan lines, we both know, what kind of effort was perpetrated on insignificant places like here and the mp.net. This is why I'm not so quick to dismiss the US Intel service. I'm coming from a place, where I instantly called bullshit on Colin Powell's unconvincing UN performance, so you know, I don't eat out of their hand. But when I look at the haystack of needles, that is the Trump campaign's omissions, Russian contacts and travels, one thing after another. My acoustic brain is picking up a melody.
          Yeah nope. These days I run on the assumption that everything that comes from an 'intel source' is a self-serving lie.

          You know how the saying goes: Expect disapointment and you'll never be disappointed.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Ivan le Fou View Post
            The DNC being hacked by Russia has not been proven.

            It has been denied by Julian Assange, who is a well known Russian agent.
            Since Julian Assange is the beacon of honesty.

            https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...alytica-244164

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Jonathan View Post
              The Russians have hacked your computer. You must act quickly to drive them out of there. Turn it off, beat it with a hammer, and pour some boiling water on top!! Hurry!
              Bleach. Don’t forget the bleach and hammers. How hard would it be for anyone to hack someone whose password is “password” and who routinely transmitted classified intelligence on a server with less security than a gmail account? The Huma(n) Weiner duo had classified emails on their home computers! Federal crime btw. Who knows who did what, since none of the servers (that survived bleach and hammers) were ever turned over to the FBI.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by J.Noah ה View Post

                That's how I feel about the Trump Administration's blatant lying, like no one knew nuffining's about Russians... Knowing nuffin about Flynn policy talks behind Obama's back... Sloppy Steve, my former chief strategist had very little contact with me... I don't know nuffin about my son's where about's during business trips... The excuses made to defend Trump are cultish, yet no one is using this line of arguement against him.

                If their is not enough "evidence" at this point, then their is also not enough evidence to conclude Uranium One... Hillary's Russian collusion...
                Yet you believed Hillary? Good Lord, double standard much?

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by J.Noah ה View Post

                  Since Julian Assange is the beacon of honesty.

                  https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...alytica-244164
                  From that article

                  According to the Daily Beast report, Cambridge Analytica CEO Alexander Nix approached Assange about recovering 33,000 emails that were deleted from Clinton’s private email server. She has said the emails were deleted because they did not relate to government business.
                  That's dumber than a sack full of hammers - literally worse than Hitler in fact. If that's the level of "journalism" then the article is a joke, just not a very good one.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by riderboy View Post

                    Yet you believed Hillary? Good Lord, double standard much?
                    When did I say I believe Hillary? I just find it comical that one can find someone innocent on an accusation, yet another person guilty with a similar accusation.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by TheKiwi View Post

                      From that article



                      That's dumber than a sack full of hammers - literally worse than Hitler in fact. If that's the level of "journalism" then the article is a joke, just not a very good one.
                      I'm not tracking your argument?

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by J.Noah ה View Post

                        I'm not tracking your argument?
                        Trying to recover the deleted emails? That's an idiots request or an idiots reporting.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by TheKiwi View Post

                          Trying to recover the deleted emails? That's an idiots request or an idiots reporting.
                          Thanks for clarifying. Agreed.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by TheKiwi View Post

                            Trying to recover the deleted emails? That's an idiots request or an idiots reporting.
                            Well, actually...

                            Hillary’s 33,000 emails might not be ‘missing’ after all

                            For months now, we’ve been told that Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 missing emails were permanently erased and destroyed beyond recovery. But newly released FBI notes strongly suggest they still exist in several locations — and they could be recovered, if only someone would impanel a grand jury and seize them.
                            In a May interview with FBI agents, an executive with the Denver contractor that maintained Clinton’s private server revealed that an underling didn’t bleach-clean all her subpoenaed emails, just ones he stored in a data file he used to transfer the emails from the server to Clinton’s aides, who in turn sorted them for delivery to Congress.
                            It turns out that investigators also know the whereabouts of the original Apple server Clinton used in her first two months in office. Recovering that equipment is critical because it contains a mass of unseen emails from Jan. 21, 2009, to March 18, 2009 — a critical period in Clinton’s tenure at State. Witnesses say the equipment was not discarded, as first believed, but “repurposed” as a “work station” used by staff in Clinton’s Chappaqua residence.
                            Yet the FBI says it “was unable to obtain the original Apple server for a forensic review.” Instead of seizing it, the agency has taken Clinton’s aides’ and lawyers’ word that the server’s bereft of relevant emails. In fact, the agency confesses on Page 27 of its 47-page investigative case summary that it failed to recover other equipment and data as well: “The FBI’s inability to recover all server equipment and the lack of complete server log data for the relevant time period limited the FBI’s forensic analysis of the server systems. As a result, FBI cyber analysis relied, in large part, on witness statements.”
                            Congressional investigators say FBI Director James Comey in his year-long “investigation” didn’t even bother to send agents to search Clinton’s homes in Chappaqua or Washington, DC. Nor did he dispatch them to the offices of the Clinton Foundation or Clinton Executive Services Corp. in New York City.
                            “The Clinton residences and other locations should have been treated like any other criminal investigation — with federal grand jury subpoenas or search warrants issued by judges and served in the middle of the night,” said veteran FBI special agent Michael M. Biasello, who worked criminal cases out of New York and other field offices for 27 years.
                            “Never — I repeat, never — in my career have I or any FBI agent known to me investigated a criminal case without the use of a federal grand jury, grand jury subpoenas or search warrants,” he said. “It’s disgraceful they weren’t used in this case.”
                            The most damning evidence against Clinton may never have been actually destroyed. It was simply left untouched by the FBI.
                            https://nypost.com/2016/10/25/hillar...ing-after-all/

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Ivan le Fou View Post
                              "...simply left untouched by the FBI." Damn, with friends in high places like the DOJ and FBI it's PARTY TIME!

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Sorry to keep you waiting, folks. Complicated business.
                                http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...de-public.html

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X